|
Hotel Marketing Coach Neil L. Salerno, CHME, CHA Internet Marketing Articles |
|
|
Building Traffic (SEO)
Featured Article "What the Heck is Hotel Revenue Management, Anyway?"
|
"Growing Tension Between Hoteliers and OTA's"…NONSENSE!
An Alternative
Viewpoint
By: Neil Salerno – Hotel Marketing Coach I just got through
reading an article titled "Growing Tension Between Hoteliers and OTA's".
There are so many of things in this article with which I don't agree, I
don't know where to begin. Either the author is attempting to sidle-up
to Choice Hotels or he just doesn't get it. I won't go through every
detail here; I would need to write a mini-novel. Let's just say I would
urge other hotels to consider some facts before acquiescing to the
article's implications. The article states
that Choice Hotels has cut-off negotiations with Expedia and have
subsequently been removed from Expedia owned sites. This is sad news,
but this is free enterprise at work, Max. Expedia and Choice Hotels can
make their own decision with whom they do business, but those decisions
should be well informed and, hopefully, beneficial. If Choice honestly
believes that they were being "snookered" by Expedia, so be it.
Personally, I feel that their decision to drop Expedia was an error and
that their naiveté is incredible. I just don't understand what they are
afraid of. Of course, I don't know the details of their negotiations,
but I do know hotel marketing and the persistent antagonism between some
quarters of the hotel industry and OTA's is troublesome to me and
promulgating this notion is dangerous. The Stockholm Syndrome?
The article
compares the Stockholm Syndrome with the after-effects of 9/11. We've
must have been in two different places, Max. The way I saw it, OTA's
saved many hotels, with rooms they had a hard time getting on their own,
and by boosting travel through
the Internet, while our industry was asleep at the helm and allowed
OTA's to take over Internet travel marketing. The hotel/travel
aggregator war of 2002 to 2004 is well documented. In many articles
beginning in 2003, I urged hotels to get-smart about the Internet and
play a quick game of catch-up with the OTA's. It was a matter of
marketing and during those days, OTA's were way ahead in mastering this
"new" medium. In the following years, the hotel industry did just that
with the help of many smart Internet-savvy hotel people. The hotel industry
made significant gains on the Net since then and they leveled the
playing field by improving their websites and concentrating on Internet
marketing. They became believers. Hoteliers took back their share of the
Internet and negotiated with OTA's to work co-operatively with them.
Blaming OTA's for smarter marketing at the outset of Internet popularity
is a silly notion. Who Cares How OTA's Make Their Money? Like any other
business, OTA's are in business to make money. In this country, Max,
free enterprise is still at work. Every business, including hotels and
OTA's, make their own decisions with whom they wish to do business and
their decision is generally based upon how much each will benefit from
the partnership. How Hotels Make Money Hotels make money
by taking in more revenue than they spend. Many hotels today are having
a tough time doing that. I would be the first person to agree that any
hotel, doing business with OTA's, which is experiencing consistent
displacement of regular higher rate rooms with rooms from OTA's should
re-think their OTA relationships. The fact is that
most hotels do not have this problem. In my opinion, this subject would
be mute if more hotels employed revenue management in their operation.
The process of RM calls for mixing a variety of rates, and profit
levels, to achieve maximum occupancy and average rate. Smart hoteliers
consider OTA business as a base which allows them to build occupancy
and, through good management of rates, to build average rate as well. It would seem to me
that our disagreement is based upon the false belief that hotels are in
competition with OTA's for the same business. This belief fosters the
notion that the big bad OTA's are stealing business which would normally
book your hotel directly through your franchise website or your own
website. Fat chance.
I hate to be the
one who breaks this to you, but Expedia and other OTA's have earned
loyalty from many travelers, especially those using air travel, through
their own hard work,
millions of advertising dollars, and some pretty innovative marketing.
The OTA's have the ability to touch travelers who wouldn't even know
your hotel exists if they didn't see it on an OTA website.
Even the very best
of hotel websites cannot compete with OTA sites. They don't have hotels
to operate and therefore the
marketing
dollars they spend cannot be duplicated by hotels, large or small.
The fact is that
Expedia commands the OTA market. Your decision to partner with them, or
any other OTA's for that matter, should be based upon whether or not you
feel you can benefit from the relationship and not because someone feels
that their rules are prohibitive ,thinks they make too much money or
thinks they are "the rate police". History Repeats Itself
Years ago, I was
vice president in charge of sales & marketing for Frenchman's Reef in
St. Thomas, USVI. A long time before the Internet, we dealt with travel
wholesalers with commissions of 25 and 30% and
rules that were tough. In those days this hotel was flagged by
Holiday Inn, with the most powerful reservation system in existence at
that time. We had choices. We
had a powerful reservation system which we could solely rely upon but
chose to partner with these aggressive wholesalers to provide us with
the exposure we needed and to tap into their huge travel agent market.
In those days, travelers wanted the security of booking with someone
they already knew; their favorite travel agent. At the peak of our
relationship, we paid wholesalers more than $9.5M. Frenchman's Reef, in
the 70's, had become one of the most successful hotels in the Caribbean. Next Steps The article's
suggestion to "invigorate the push in the direct online channel" is not
a factor in this discussion because every hotel should do this in any
event. No hotel should be totally reliant upon OTA's. But, discard the
notion that this will have any impact on OTA's; they are not going away
anytime soon. Either you need and want their business or you don't. Stop worrying about
how and how much Expedia earns, look at your individual situation.
Attempting to demonize Expedia because someone resents the size of their
commissions or their rules of partnership is plain wrong. I know of many
hotels which are thankful for the business they receive from Expedia and
other OTA's while using that business to build their own profits. (Back to Hotel News Articles) |